US Federal Court Rejects Global Search Order

from EFF

After years of litigation in two countries, a federal court in the US has weighed in on a thorny question: Does Google US have to obey a Canadian court order requiring Google to take down information around the world, ignoring contrary rules in other jurisdictions? According to the Northern District of California, the answer is no.

The case is Google v. Equustek, and it’s part of a growing trend in which courts around the world order companies to take actions far beyond the borders those courts usually respect. It started as a simple dispute in Canada between British Columbia-based Equustek Solutions and Morgan Jack and others, known as the Datalink defendants. Equustek accuses them of selling counterfeit Equustek routers online. The defendants never appeared in court to challenge the claim, which meant that Equustek effectively won without the court ever considering whether the claim was valid.

That was all normal enough, but Equustek also argued that California-based Google facilitated access to the defendants’ sites. Although Google was not named in the lawsuit and everyone agreed that Google had done nothing wrong, it voluntarily took down specific URLs that directed users to the defendants’ products and ads under the Canadian domains. Equustek wanted more and so it persuaded a Canadian court to order Google to delete the allegedly infringing search results from all other Google domains, including and Google appealed, but both the British Columbia Court of Appeal and the Supreme Court of Canada upheld that decision.

Here’s the thing: a court in one country has no business issuing a decision affecting the rights of citizens around the world. As EFF explained in numerous filings in the case, a global de-indexing order conflicts with rights recognized in the U.S, such as the right to access information and the protections of Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act. The Canadian order set a dangerous precedent that would be followed by others, creating a race to the bottom as courts in countries with far weaker speech protections would feel empowered to effectively edit the Internet.

More here.

Posted in Law, Privacy, Web and tagged , , , .

One Comment

  1. In this very interesting case, a company by the name of Equustek has asked Google, a major search engine to remove certain pieces of info off the internet. As most people know, each of us (Canada and the United States), has the right to ask of this from our respective countries, but other nations do not have the authority to ask that of us. Therefore, Google, knowing its rights, did not delete the info. Knowing that this case involves two major companies, it would have to involve some legal precedencies. In addition, the right to control access to the information / domains is at stake as well. When it is all said and done, other nations around the world will have to adapt to the effects of the results of this very case. Restricting the domain names would most likely hurt businesses in Canada, but it is not an excuse to violate the rights of the American people.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *